Post by Glenda Gustin on Aug 13, 2022 21:37:25 GMT
www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/06/devastating-covid-response-and-harmful-vaccines-dr-mike-yeadon-joins-dr-paul-alexander-video-interview/
It is literally absurd. the vaccines don't prevent transmission. There is no possible public health argument to do what they're doing. And they're not stupid. These people are not stupid. They know exactly what they're doing. And this final thing superfluous in effect these toxic vaccines. Vaccines are my meat and drink. Not just vaccines, but toxic vaccines, designed and working what you sense likely to happen. You look for efficacy, is this going to produce an immune response, and hopefully the absense of toxic side effects was my job. I was the seniormost person 17 years in my field of exploratory vaccines, and then I was six years successful biotech and I think I know what I'm talking about.
And when I looked at the so-called vaccines, I saw a completely unprecedented approach. Where, by design, they would take a piece of this alleged pathogen the spikey part or the spike protein on the outside of what they have declared is the structure of Sars Cov-2 and attach it to, in the case of the DNA vaccines, it was like a chimp DNA of SARS. And in the MRNA vaccines in the case of Moderna and Pfizer, it was covered in grease, essentially, allowing the messenger RNA to slide into the cells.
I knew, thinking about it, that this is the wrong choice. Let me explain why. When you take a piece, a piece of a pathogen, and then put it in the body to practice on it and become immune to it, you always ask yourself if this is a safe thing to do. Because I'm going to get the body to practice on it, yes, but will there be any toxicity in what I'm doing? And you know what, by far, the most toxic parts of SARS CoV 2 and related coronaviruses is the spike protein which is able to initiate cascade events that leads to blood clots. It also can have neurological impacts. We know this, and we knew this in 2020 by way of viruses, other viruses affecting humans and animals. And yet, not just one company but four companies Modersa, Pfizer, Astrazeneca, and J and J, all alighted on that. Don't you think it's surprising.
I wrote to James Merck? who was in charge of vaccines at J and J, and I said to him "No brainstorming team, James, that you and I ever led would have come out of that closed-door meeting with "Let's pick the spike protein". We even talked about things like that 15 years ago. You'd have picked the nuclear capsule on the nuclear protein, because they are not strongly biological.
Here's the other thing, you would pick a piece of the pathogen very different from you. The spike protein isn't similar to humans, but it's the least dissimilar. There are slight overlaps. to the extent that I would think they've taken the risk of what's called autoimmunicy, to get the body to respond to the spike protein. There are lots of human proteins that are just similar enough that in the unlucky penumbra some people will find their immune system will attack bits of themselves. They could have avoided that by picking something more different from you, so that when you then mount an attack on that new foreign thing none of those weapons, the gun and ammo aren't going to harm you. That's the second thing.
The third thing, you would pick genetically the parts of a pathogen that are the most stable, because we know when they replicate they make typographical mistakes and surprisingly drift from the one you first worked on. And again, this wretched spike protein was well known to be the part that adapts most quickly, it's the bit that interacts with the host. Of course it will migrate, it will evolve quickly ...
The bits in the center, those are pretty genetically stable for three reasons; safety, acute safety, and maintaining efficacy over time. You would use something other than what they did and all four of them did it. Sorry, my conclusion your honor if I was trying to persuade a judge to support what I've just said, I would say this was evidence of collusion, and malfeasance. They have intentionally harmed you. They have not put in place the ideal vaccine, but they've picked something that is the least likely to work and most likely to harm you. And it's not that much of a shock to me.
View less
It is literally absurd. the vaccines don't prevent transmission. There is no possible public health argument to do what they're doing. And they're not stupid. These people are not stupid. They know exactly what they're doing. And this final thing superfluous in effect these toxic vaccines. Vaccines are my meat and drink. Not just vaccines, but toxic vaccines, designed and working what you sense likely to happen. You look for efficacy, is this going to produce an immune response, and hopefully the absense of toxic side effects was my job. I was the seniormost person 17 years in my field of exploratory vaccines, and then I was six years successful biotech and I think I know what I'm talking about.
And when I looked at the so-called vaccines, I saw a completely unprecedented approach. Where, by design, they would take a piece of this alleged pathogen the spikey part or the spike protein on the outside of what they have declared is the structure of Sars Cov-2 and attach it to, in the case of the DNA vaccines, it was like a chimp DNA of SARS. And in the MRNA vaccines in the case of Moderna and Pfizer, it was covered in grease, essentially, allowing the messenger RNA to slide into the cells.
I knew, thinking about it, that this is the wrong choice. Let me explain why. When you take a piece, a piece of a pathogen, and then put it in the body to practice on it and become immune to it, you always ask yourself if this is a safe thing to do. Because I'm going to get the body to practice on it, yes, but will there be any toxicity in what I'm doing? And you know what, by far, the most toxic parts of SARS CoV 2 and related coronaviruses is the spike protein which is able to initiate cascade events that leads to blood clots. It also can have neurological impacts. We know this, and we knew this in 2020 by way of viruses, other viruses affecting humans and animals. And yet, not just one company but four companies Modersa, Pfizer, Astrazeneca, and J and J, all alighted on that. Don't you think it's surprising.
I wrote to James Merck? who was in charge of vaccines at J and J, and I said to him "No brainstorming team, James, that you and I ever led would have come out of that closed-door meeting with "Let's pick the spike protein". We even talked about things like that 15 years ago. You'd have picked the nuclear capsule on the nuclear protein, because they are not strongly biological.
Here's the other thing, you would pick a piece of the pathogen very different from you. The spike protein isn't similar to humans, but it's the least dissimilar. There are slight overlaps. to the extent that I would think they've taken the risk of what's called autoimmunicy, to get the body to respond to the spike protein. There are lots of human proteins that are just similar enough that in the unlucky penumbra some people will find their immune system will attack bits of themselves. They could have avoided that by picking something more different from you, so that when you then mount an attack on that new foreign thing none of those weapons, the gun and ammo aren't going to harm you. That's the second thing.
The third thing, you would pick genetically the parts of a pathogen that are the most stable, because we know when they replicate they make typographical mistakes and surprisingly drift from the one you first worked on. And again, this wretched spike protein was well known to be the part that adapts most quickly, it's the bit that interacts with the host. Of course it will migrate, it will evolve quickly ...
The bits in the center, those are pretty genetically stable for three reasons; safety, acute safety, and maintaining efficacy over time. You would use something other than what they did and all four of them did it. Sorry, my conclusion your honor if I was trying to persuade a judge to support what I've just said, I would say this was evidence of collusion, and malfeasance. They have intentionally harmed you. They have not put in place the ideal vaccine, but they've picked something that is the least likely to work and most likely to harm you. And it's not that much of a shock to me.
View less